Newly released footage has revealed the chilling moment convicted murderer Vickrum Digwa instructed his mother to remove the knife used to fatally stab teenager Henry Nowak, providing jurors with crucial evidence that later led to her own conviction for assisting an offender.
The disturbing video, made public by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), captures audio recorded on Digwa’s mobile phone shortly after the fatal attack in Southampton on December 3, 2025. Prosecutors say the recording demonstrates that Digwa deliberately sought to have the murder weapon removed from the scene in an effort to hinder the police investigation.
@thetelegraphNew footage shows the moment murderer Vickrum Digwa told his mother to take the knife he used to stab Henry Nowak to death away from the crime scene. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) released the video after Digwa’s mother, Kiran Kaur, was jailed for three years at Southampton Crown Court last week for assisting an offender. The 53-year-old, of Southampton, had been found guilty in May after taking the weapon back to the family home nearby on the night of the murder on Dec 3, 2025. Digwa, 23, was jailed for life with a minimum term of 21 years on June 1 for the murder of the 18-year-old finance student, after falsely claiming Mr Nowak had racially abused him. Read the full story at the link.
The release of the footage comes just days after Digwa’s mother, Kiran Kaur, was sentenced to three years in prison after being found guilty of helping her son conceal evidence following the killing.
Kaur, 53, appeared before Southampton Crown Court, where Judge William Mousley KC concluded that she knowingly removed the knife after believing her son had stabbed 18-year-old Henry Nowak.
The judge said her actions represented a serious attempt to interfere with the investigation into a brutal murder that devastated the victim’s family.
The newly published recording is brief but deeply significant.
Although the camera is pointed toward the ground and does not capture the people involved, prosecutors say Digwa can clearly be heard speaking to his mother in Punjabi.
According to the official transcript released by the CPS, Digwa tells her: “Take this,” which investigators say was a direct reference to the knife used moments earlier during the fatal confrontation.
That single instruction would later become one of the central pieces of evidence presented during Kaur’s trial.
Judge Mousley said that by the time Digwa asked his mother to remove the weapon, she either knew or believed that her son had seriously injured Henry.
Rather than urging him to contact emergency services or surrender to police, she instead carried the knife away from the crime scene.
During sentencing, the judge criticised Kaur’s actions in stark terms.
He said a responsible parent would have confronted her son’s behaviour and encouraged him to do the right thing instead of helping conceal evidence.
Instead, he found that she transported the weapon back to the family’s nearby home, where it was placed among a collection of ceremonial knives and other bladed weapons kept in Digwa’s bedroom.
The judge concluded that hiding the weapon in this manner would have helped disguise its connection to the fatal stabbing.
He also found that Kaur’s conduct extended beyond simply removing the knife.
According to the court, her behaviour before and after leaving the scene reinforced Digwa’s false claim that he had acted as the victim rather than the attacker.
Judge Mousley said those actions supported what he described as Digwa’s “pretence” that he had done nothing wrong.
He further concluded that Kaur’s involvement contributed to one of the most distressing aspects of the investigation.
Following the stabbing, police officers initially treated Henry Nowak as a suspect after Digwa falsely claimed that the teenager had racially abused him and posed a threat.
As a result, officers handcuffed the critically injured 18-year-old while trying to establish what had happened.
Henry lost consciousness shortly afterward and later died from his injuries.
The mistaken arrest sparked widespread criticism after police body-worn camera footage was released showing the gravely wounded teenager being restrained during his final moments.
The incident prompted calls for greater scrutiny of the initial police response and has remained one of the most controversial aspects of the case.
Earlier this year, Digwa himself was convicted of murder following a lengthy trial.
The 23-year-old was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 21 years after jurors rejected his account of the confrontation.
Throughout the proceedings, prosecutors argued that Digwa deliberately fabricated allegations that Henry had racially abused him in an effort to justify the attack.
The jury ultimately concluded those claims were false.
Instead, prosecutors successfully argued that Digwa fatally stabbed the finance student with a ceremonial dagger before attempting to portray himself as the victim.
The conviction brought some measure of justice for Henry’s family, but the subsequent trial of Digwa’s mother revealed further details about the events immediately after the killing.
Prosecutors told jurors that Kaur’s decision to remove the knife significantly complicated the investigation during its earliest stages.
By concealing the weapon, they argued, she helped delay detectives’ ability to establish exactly what had occurred.
Her conviction for assisting an offender reflected the court’s conclusion that she knowingly interfered with the administration of justice.
Following her sentencing, Henry Nowak’s family issued an emotional statement expressing disappointment that many questions surrounding the case still remain unanswered.
They said they would continue campaigning to ensure every aspect of the investigation is fully examined.
“Our focus is on making sure the ongoing investigations leave no stone unturned as we fight for the full truth about what happened last December,” the family said.
They also renewed calls for changes they believe are necessary following the handling of the case.
Since Henry’s death, his family has become increasingly vocal in urging authorities to review the circumstances surrounding both the investigation and the emergency response.
Particular attention has centred on the police decision to handcuff Henry while he was critically injured.
Body-worn camera footage released during the investigation showed officers placing the teenager in restraints shortly before his condition rapidly deteriorated.
The images generated significant public reaction, with many questioning whether the initial assessment of the situation contributed to failures in providing immediate medical assistance.
Police have maintained that officers responded based on the information available at the time.
However, the release of additional evidence, including the phone recording involving Digwa and his mother, has further highlighted how misleading information allegedly provided by the killer influenced investigators during the earliest stages of the inquiry.
The CPS said publication of the footage followed Kaur’s conviction and sentencing because it formed an important part of the evidence presented in court.
Officials believe the recording clearly demonstrated Digwa’s intention to distance himself from the murder weapon and enlist his mother’s help in concealing it.
Legal experts note that offences involving assisting an offender are treated particularly seriously when they occur after crimes as grave as murder.
While Kaur did not participate in the killing itself, the court concluded that removing the knife represented a deliberate attempt to frustrate the criminal investigation.
Judge Mousley stressed that parents confronted with such circumstances have a responsibility to encourage lawful behaviour rather than shield family members from accountability.
For Henry Nowak’s relatives, however, the legal proceedings have done little to lessen the pain of losing an 18-year-old whose life was cut tragically short.
The promising finance student had been preparing for his future when he was fatally attacked.
His family has repeatedly described him as a caring and ambitious young man whose death has left an immeasurable void.
Although Digwa is now serving a life sentence and his mother has been imprisoned for her role in concealing evidence, Henry’s loved ones insist their campaign is far from over.
They continue pressing for a full examination of every decision made before, during and after the fatal stabbing, arguing that only complete transparency will provide the answers they have sought since the night Henry was killed.
With the newly released recording now in the public domain, the prosecution believes the evidence paints a clearer picture of the immediate aftermath of the murder—one in which the killer’s first instinct was not to seek help, but to hide the weapon that had ended a young man’s life.
